How to write weekly posts

Weekly Student Blog Instructions

Purpose: Maps are primary sources. They offer viewers glimpses of historic landscapes, of visible (and invisible) features of the world surrounding us, and they document how those elements have changed over time. Historians often use maps to illustrate their narratives and orient their readers to unfamiliar times and places. Maps offer much more to historians than illustration, however. Mapmakers’ decisions reflect their own “worldviews,” i.e. their cultural, social, and economic priorities. Maps are selective mirrors that often reflect as much about the culture that produced them as the environments they depict. In both respects, maps equal (and often surpass) textual sources in the depth of information potentially available to historians. These weekly blogs are opportunities for students to critically examine maps as primary sources.

Expectations: Each week, you will be responsible for submitting a thoughtful analysis of maps. Your blogs should be concise (no more than 400 words) and will address two primary subjects 1. A formal analysis of the work(s) 2. An insightful discussion of the work in the context of course material (discursive analysis). These short essays must be posted to the blog using the tag “Student Weekly Posts” before the beginning of class on the Monday of the week they are listed in the syllabus because they will form the core of our discussion.

You are expected to use images (i.e. of map details, other maps, etc) in your blog submissions.

1866Here is a point I’m making by showing the detail of Omaha City, Nebraska. Oscar F. Davis, 1866. Courtesy Omaha Public Library.

 Questions to guide your analysis:

Formal analysis of the work:

  • Type: Topographic/Thematic/Reference/Other, or a mix?
  • Layout: How do the non-cartographic elements of the map aid or detract from the clarity and purpose of the map?
  • Carto-graphics: How do the graphic elements of data (symbology, projection, choice of color, scale, extent) further the goals of the map?

Discursive analysis

  • Author – Who created this map?
  • Audience – who was this map created for?
  • Subject – What does this map depict?
  • Arguments – What is the proposition, argument, or message of this map?
  • Time – When is this map? Does it depict change over time? Multiple timelines? Is it timeless?
  • Questions: How might the map be adapted to more effectively convey its message?